Search Chum

Share Chum
RSS Chum
Translate Chum


Entries in wild steelhead (44)


Tell NOAA Not to Compromise on Wild Steelhead Protection

Submit your comments: Tell NOAA you will not stand for them undermining federal environmental protections for threatened steelhead

Steelhead are a wonder of nature. Their daunting journey from the river of their birth to the ocean and back is awe-inspiring. Their sheer strength and ability to traverse seemingly impassable waters is nothing short of remarkable. And they have exceptional power, size, and beauty. These attributes as well as their indelible mystique combine to make steelhead the pinnacle of freshwater fishing.
Legend has it that there were once so many steelhead and salmon in Washington’s rivers that you could walk across the water on the backs of fish. But gross mismanagement of these rivers for the last century has decimated these steelhead and salmon populations, relegating the stirring images of rivers full of fish to a distant memory. Now wild steelhead populations represent a dismal 3% of their historic numbers in Puget Sound, yet 66% of their historical habitat remains. As a result, these fish are listed under the Endangered Species Act.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – the federal agency charged with protecting these imperiled fish – government-operated steelhead hatcheries are one of the four known causes for the precipitous decline of wild steelhead populations. Despite this understanding, NOAA is currently undermining critical federal regulations in a politically motivated effort to expedite approval of Puget Sound hatchery programs.  
This undercutting of federal procedures represents a significant departure for NOAA, which spent the last 11 years rigorously developing a comprehensive environmental review of hatchery program’s impact in Puget Sound. NOAA was expected to release the review’s findings this spring but at the last minute suddenly abandoned this 11-year comprehensive review. In its place, NOAA is now conducting a cursory environmental assessment for three hatcheries in three different watersheds.
NOAA is trying to justify this approach as simply a strategy adjustment. However, this dramatic reversal is much more than that. In reality, it is a precedent setting approach that has the potential to undercut critical protections for not just steelhead but all endangered species, including orca whales, wolves, and salmon. Left unchecked, this decision could have far-reaching implications as it could make federal approval easier for destructive projects across the United States.
Time is running out, but we still have the potential to stop NOAA from setting this dangerous precedent that will imperil threatened steelhead populations and all ESA-listed species. Please submit a comment below and tell NOAA you will not stand for them undermining federal environmental protections for threatened steelhead.
To learn more about the environmental protections NOAA is undermining and the specifics of this environmental review process, please see below:
1. NOAA’s proposed Environmental Assessment (EA) is insufficient and violates the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)

• An environmental impact statement (EIS) is needed to fully evaluate the cumulative effects of all Puget Sound hatchery programs on threatened & endangered species—including steelhead—throughout Puget Sound.
• Puget Sound hatchery programs can have significant adverse impacts on ESA-listed wild salmon and steelhead, making the proposed approval of the three steelhead hatcheries controversial, thus meeting two of NEPA’s thresholds for an EIS.
2. NOAA has not provided adequate time to review the EA and associated technical documents

• NOAA released the EA on 3/26 with a due date for comments on 4/27, which amounted to 33 days.  According to NOAA, all comments submitted from 3/26-4/13 were lost because of NOAA technical difficulties, with no way to contact those that submitted comments.  A new due date was set for 5/4.  This new due date results in a total of only 21 days to submit comments on over 1,400 pages included in the EA, Hatchery & Genetic Management Plans, and referenced literature.
3. NOAA has not completed a Puget Sound Steelhead Recovery Plan

• A recovery plan is required by law under the ESA; Puget Sound steelhead were ESA-listed eight years ago in 2007.
• A recovery plan is fundamental to an appropriate EA or EIS.  It is needed in order to determine what levels of hatchery impacts to each Puget Sound steelhead population, if any, are compatible with recovery.
Submit your comments: Tell NOAA you will not stand for them undermining federal environmental protections for threatened steelhead

Please submit your comments no later than 5:00 p.m. Pacific time on May 4, 2015.


Idaho Wild Steelhead and Salmon Need Your Help 

Washington and Oregon have made changes to their regulations to emphasize proper fish handling. Tell Idaho Fish and Game they need to do the same by filling out their online Angler Input form.

Comments are being accepted through 3/29.

LINK (via: Idaho Council of Trout Unlimited)


Keep wild steelhead wet! 

Infographic courtesy of Rich Simms

Wild winter steelhead enter our coastal rivers in a more mature condition and closer to spawn timing with fish sometimes caught within hours to days of freshwater entry or in their holding and spawning areas. This vulnerable condition makes them susceptible to loss in fry production by improper handling practices and exposure to air. Let’s work together to reduce our impact by keeping wild steelhead underwater.

Download the full-size image HERE.


Wild Steelheaders United

This short edited and shot by Shane Anderson was screened at last night's Seattle Wild Steelheaders United launch party.


Come on in, the water is fine!

Yes Virginia, steelhead are trout too.

Today is the launch day for Wild Steelheaders United.

From TU:

Wild Steelheaders United was established to educate and mobilize the numerous wild steelhead advocates wanting to engage in the Initiative. It is a place where anglers can become more informed about wild steelhead biology and ecology, keep abreast policy issues, and learn about Trout Unlimited's conservation work.

We may not always agree. We may not always have the answers. But we steelheaders share a common vision and for the future of wild steelhead. Together, we are a community with strength.

With millions of dollars invested on the ground, Trout Unlimited supports this vision through the Wild Steelhead Initiative.

Learn more at and

TU's commitment to putting some real skin in the steelhead conservation game is a very good thing.

That said, this launch is also a great opportunity to recognize and celebrate the tireless work of the organizations and individuals, many of them just volunteers who, have for decades been on the front lines fighting on behalf of wild steelhead. The work at times has been frustrating, and there have been disagreements along the way. But there has always been one singular focus; it's about the fish. Even more importantly those same individuals and the groups they represent have inspired many like myself to also take up the cause. I'd hate to think what the state of wild steelhead would be today as TU officially enters the fray without all of their efforts.

I look forward to seeing my fellow wild steelhead advocates both past and future at Earl's place in Seattle this evening. The water is indeed fine.


TAKE ACTION - Prevent the collapse and ESA listing of wild steelhead on Washington's Olympic Peninsula


Here's your chance to make a strong statement on behalf of the wild native steelhead on the OP.

It will only take a second for you to send a message to Washington Gov. Jay Inslee urging him to prevent the collapse of wild native steelhead on the Olympic Peninsula.

Sign the petition and help the spread the word.

Just do it!