advertise here 

Search

Share Chum

Reel Pure Store

Oilskin Hat: 25 bones

 Euro Fish Decals: 3 bones

Get Chum News - Win Free Stuff
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Translate Chum

    RSS Food
    « Call to Action - Protect Florida Permit | Main | Vote now for Oct. Slab of the Month »
    Wednesday
    Nov042009

    Hatchery fish have their place, but is the Makenzie River the place?

    Oregon’s blue-ribbon Metolius and Deschutes rivers are examples of a rapid recovery of wild populations after the elimination of hatchery plants. The state’s own McKenzie management policy spells out the road to recovery in a single, easy step: Remove stocked trout from the McKenzie. All we need to do now is follow it.

    Read more at The Register Guard here

    As there should be, a hefty amount of debate surrounds this issue - why not let the Chum Nation chime in.  Let's sound off on our forum

    Reader Comments (3)

    It's McKenzie!

    November 4, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKruiser73

    This is my home river, and thanks for covering this issue. If folks want to get involved with the McKenzie Upper Willamette Trout Unlimited Chapter that's spearheading this, they can sign up for our emails here: http://tu678.org/mail.cgi and join our Facebook cause here: http://apps.facebook.com/causes/387154/35573117

    November 4, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMatt

    can you explain your rationale for why hatcheries have ANY place on our rivers?

    November 4, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRiverist

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>